|
|
Candice Hopkin’s Top Ten
(Google
for more info)
This top 10 list was compiled,
initially, for the Banff International Curatorial Institute
symposium: entitled Trade Secrets Education/Collection/History
that took place between November 12 and November 14,
2008. All of the participants were asked to present
their current research in the form of a “Top 10
list.” The list, associated now with magazines
like Art Forum where a host of highly regarded critics,
curators and artists make number their most influential
movies, music, books, artworks, or exhibitions they
have recently encountered. Not surprisingly, the most
illuminating choices are nearly always from artists.
Other magazines take it to other extremes; Flash Art,
considering things as they do from a more glabal perspective,
even does a top 100.
The following is my list, as I saw it, in mid-November:
This list includes work by a number of Inuit artists
and collectives in part, because these things are immensely
interesting, but also because of a recent unfolding
in the far north involving Russia and Canada and soon
a host of other international players.
Presently there is a slow race taking place of different
signifiers (Russia with its flag and Canada with the
recent decision to build six naval patrol vessels) in
the northern hemisphere. It concerns Arctic sovereignty
and the re-definition of borders that is taking place
as a result of the opening of the north to “realize
it’s full potential,” its “full potential”
being further resource extraction and the imminent opening
up of year-round international shipping routes due to
the rapid melting of the arctic ice.
This summer Russian explorers planted their country’s
flag on the seabed 4,200m (14,000ft) below the North
Pole to further their claims to the Arctic. The rust-proof
titanium metal flag was brought by explorers travelling
in two mini-submarines, in what is believed to be the
first expedition of its kind. Segei Balyaskikov, speaking
on behalf of the Russian Arctic and Antarctic Institute
stated that, “It’s a very important move
for Russia to demonstrate its potential in the Arctic...
It’s like putting a flag on the Moon.” The
region underneath (and on top of) the flag is not officially
a part of any single country’s territory but is
governed instead by complex international agreements.
The planting of this flag brings up a host of questions
regarding how territories are mapped, identified and
understood and how this mapping has shifted from the
surface of land - topographical - to an even more lateral
exploration to contain sea beds and underwater borders.
What may seem like a localized event is in fact an international
issue that has a significant impact on ideas of nationalism,
it’s relationship to geography, and in turn colonialism.
The first few artists on this list are rethinking representation
in the Arctic in film, the internet and on paper.
1.
Before Tomorrow, a feature length film co-produced by
Arnait productions and Isuma Productions.
Filmed between July 2006 and Janaury 2007, Before
Tomorrow was directed by Marie-Hélène
Cousineau and Madeline Ivalu and adapted from a novel
by Danish writer Jørn Riel. The project is the
first feature from the Arnait Video Production, a collective
based in Igloolik who has been making videos since 1991.
Arnait’s productions have focused on the stories
of Inuit women and are a study on cultural authenticity
and community involvement.
Like Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner,
this film promises to irrevocably change the way Inuit
culture is understood and represented now.
Before Tomorrow poignantly
addresses the direct impacts of colonization in the
north and takes place circa 1840 at a time when many
Inuit communities have heard of, but have yet to encounter,
white men. In the film, one event changes everything,
upon the return of two people to camp they find that
“everyone is dead, their bodies twisted in pain
and covered with blisters. Beside their bloated corpses,
[there are] objects known to belong to the white foreigners...
a steel needle, a tin cup.”
2.
The drawings of Pudlo Pudlat:
Born in 1916, Pudlat died in Cape Dorset in 1992. His
drawings are both a documentation of the incommensurability
that occurs when two different cultures meet, but they
also represent a site of resistance: within them is
a place where animals have taken over the world, birds
are as big as boats, where sharks pull sleds. Pudlat
renders a world where the tables are turned on technology
and it is the animals who call the shots.
3. Isuma
T.V.
From Isuma Productions, Isuma T.V. is a portal for indigenous
filmmakers. The website can be accessed and streamed
at www.isuma.tv.
4. Walrus
Magazine
Walrus
is a Canadian Magazine started in 2003. In a time when
journalism in North America is increasingly compromised,
I think that Walrus is offering something else. Coincidentally
they also have some of the better art writing in Canada.
In their words, “We are committed to publishing
the best work by the best writers from Canada and elsewhere
on a wide range of topics for readers who are curious
about the world.”
5. Two books
by architect Eyal Weizman:
a) Rafi
Segal and Eyal Weizman: A Civilian Occupation.
Censored last year by the Association of Israeli Architects,
A Civilian Occupation is the first attempt by Israeli
architects, scholars, journalists, and photographers
to highlight the role of Israeli architecture in the
Middle East conflict.
As the authors write, “We were trying to break
out the reasons for why the forms are the way they are
and reflect from that backwards on the whole ethics
of architecture in Israel.”
b) Hollow
Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation,
edited by Eyal Weizman
A study in late-modern colonial occupation, this book
shows how a military urbanism based on walling, layering,
and burrowing, has reconfigured political space in Israel.
The book brings forward the direct involvement that
architecture and planning have had in violating international
humanitarian law.
To quote Weizman:
Peace
technicians—the people who are always drawing
new maps for a solution—arrive at completely insane
proposals for solving the problem of international boundaries
in three dimensions. And when you have Jewish enclaves
in Palestinian territory, you have to build either tunnels
or bridges that connect them to each other. Both typologies
were experimented with and proposed throughout negotiations.
The most obvious is the proposed safe passage between
the West Bank and Gaza that has a Palestinian road with
Palestinian sovereignty that goes over Israel’s
sovereign territory—with the international boundary
being the thermodynamic joint between the column and
the road. We get into incredibly bizarre and dystopian
solutions.
Jerusalem itself, according to
the Clinton plan, would have had 64 kilometers of walls
and 40 bridges and tunnels connecting the enclaves to
each other. Imagine an urban environment that operates
like that. It would make L.A.’s highway system
look flat. This is the total collapse of the idea of
territory as produced by maps. Nationalism and mapmaking
were always bound together. You had a map and you drew
a boundary. But what you see in the West Bank is that
sovereign relations are attempting to play themselves
out three-dimensionally. And that is obviously an unworkable
absurdity.
6. The Aboriginal
Tent Embassy in Canberra Australia:
In 1972 in Canberra Australia, Aboriginal Australians
erected a tent embassy outside of the Federal Parliament
House in the Australian Capital Territory in an attempt
to highlight their then position as foreigners in their
own lands. The Embassy now stands as a temporary monument
of sorts to the Australian Aboriginal rights movement.
An embassy is generally understood to be a diplomatic
station for ambassadors in a foreign land; in this instance
the tent embassy provides a space for dissent—as
a form of nomadic resistance.
Although the Parliament has changed locations, the Embassy
endures temporarily to today and is listed in the Register
of Australia’s National Estate as an official
cultural heritage site.
7. Museums by Artists, published by Art
Metropole, 1983.
Museums by Artists is a book edited by AA Bronson and
Peggy Gale. A significant precursor to the perhaps better-known
1999 exhibition, Museum as Muse curated by Kynaston
McShine at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, this
book reminds me of the importance of considering what
sites for seeing art can be and that it is very often
artists who imagine what these exhibition spaces could
be and who also think critically about what they are.
8. Jimmie
Durham: Poles to Mark the Center of the World
This is a series of sculptures, the first of which were
initiated in the early 1990s. I like to think of them
as a proposal for a way to live in the world. They emphasize
the importance of continually changing the frame of
reference for understanding your relationship with that
world.
Since moving to Europe in 1994, Jimmie Durham’s
practice has been against architecture (and with that
monuments, single dead-end narratives, the weight of
history). In 1995, shortly after making the trip over
from Mexico, he began to create a work carving a series
of poles that would each mark of “The Centre of
the World.” He made the first one for Brussels,
a city the artist described as trying to be the economic
and political centre of Europe. Shortly thereafter he
made one for Siberia.
In relation to this work he wrote: “I decided
that every continent has seven centres. This is an arbitrary
decision - maybe there are eight, maybe there are nine
- it doesn’t matter. And every village also has
seven centres. For every continent I would make a staff
of the seven centres.”
A centre then is a consensual fiction: it does not exist
on its own; rather it is created, and sustained, by
the very belief that it exists. The same could be said
for peripheries. Understood in the context of his larger
art practice the Poles to Mark the Centre of the World
is one of many projects set at destabilizing the foundations
of architecture and its meanings. With regards to this
he writes:
…
I don’t feel that I live in Europe, I feel that
I live in the continent called Eurasia, which is an
unknowably large continent. That’s what I like
about it, but it’s heavy with art history at the
same time. And it has a history of Joseph Beuys deciding
that he was a personal bridge between the East and the
West, between Siberia and Europe for example. A romantic
old idea of the artist as hero, and the artist could
solve the problems by heroic gesture. But I like Joseph
Beuys all the same…
9.
Power Transposition Spell by The Center for Tactical
Magic
I am currently co-editing a book, together with Marisa
Jahn and Berin Golonu, entitled Recipes for an Encounter.
In it we are publishing a work by the San Francisco-based
Center for Tactical Magic. It’s a power transposition
spell in thirteen simple steps. The full spell can be
accessed here:
www.tacticalmagic.org/CTM/thoughts/graf%20spell.htm
Following in some senses, a William Burroughs cut up
and the sometimes generative act of radically changing
the physicality of a text to alter its meaning, the
recipes book ends with instruction on how to make the
book into a bomb. The bomb is a generative, not destructive
act, a means to implode the text and create any infinite
number of more textual encounters.
10. Michael
Taussig:
The final author on this list offers another perspective
on magic and power and how these are used in relation
to colonialism. The first book is a study on how mimesis
is radically embedded in alterity.
a)
Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses
(1993)
Taussig states that the purpose of this text is to examine,
“he politics of epistemic murk and the fiction
of the real, in the creation of Indians, in the role
of the myth and magic in colonial violence as much as
in its healing, and in the way that healing can mobilize
terror in order to subvert it . . . through the tripping
up of power in its own disorderliness. ….That
is why my subject is not the truth of being but the
social being of truth, not whether facts are real but
what the politics of their interpretation and representation
are.” (xiii, italics added).
I think that the difference between “the truth
of being” and the “social bring of truth”
is a vital in understanding the relationship between
indigeneity and representation.
b)
Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in
Terror and Healing (1987)
Again, to quote Taussig whose words provide an excellent
synopsis: “So it has been through the sweep of
colonial history where the colonizers provided the colonized
with the left - handed gift of the image of the wild
man - a gift whose powers the colonizers would be blind
to, were it not for the reciprocation of the colonized,
bringing together in the dialogical imagination of colonization
an image that wrests from civilization its demonic power”
|