| CCI
Symposium 2007 Speaking Notes:
Preserving Aboriginal Heritage: The Fusion of Technical
and Traditional Approaches at
the Canadian Museum of Civilization
BY
JOHN MOSES
Indigenous rights, including those
involving culture and heritage, and thus conservation,
continue to receive elaboration at the level of international
law, as with ongoing discussions surrounding the June,
2006 proclamation of the United Nations’ Universal
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Domestically,
individual countries might enact legislation or draft
national policy in these same areas. As indigenous (or
“Aboriginal” rights, here in Canada) receive
articulation through such means, the challenge for institutions
such as museums which house collections of Aboriginal
artifacts becomes expressing these in concrete form.
Land claims, the Ethical Guidelines for Research published
in the 1996 Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal
Peoples ; and the Joint CMA/AFN Task Force Report on
Museums & First Peoples ; have all influenced policy
at federal institutions like the Canadian Museum of
Civilization (CMC), in such areas as repatriation and
human remains. Additionally, unique innovations including
the incorporation of Aboriginal traditional care and
other cultural protocols into museum storage and exhibition
methods, and the provision of specialized collections
care training tailored to the unique needs of Aboriginal
interns, have been the hallmarks of CMC’s particular
approach to the fusion of technical and traditional
methods in artifact conservation.
The head of CMC’s Aboriginal
Training Program, Jameson Brant, and myself, are speaking
in much more detail later in this Symposium concerning
this aspect, so I will not go into any further details
right now.
But as we have seen already today,
and as we shall continue to see for the rest of the
coming week, the conservation profession continues to
make great strides in engaging with indigenous and Aboriginal
peoples at the local level and at the community level.
With respect, I submit that the next great challenge
lies in changing the face and the demographic of the
conservation profession itself: we need to see more
Aboriginal persons working as professional conservators
at the mainstream institutions. Our respective institutions
need to do more to hire, train, retain, and promote
professional conservators of Aboriginal heritage.
It’s no longer good enough that we simply engage
periodically with Aboriginal groups at the community
level on particular finite projects.
As a workforce equity and diversity
issue if nothing else, there is a crisis of under-representation
of Native people working in the range of the heritage-related
disciplines, including conservation, that needs to be
addressed by special measures. Our profession is too
homogeneous, given the range of cultural materials that
our institutions historically have presumed to collect,
and which we now presume to treat. In very practical
terms, our institutions need to set-aside positions
as Native-only staffing, and then through a competitive
process bring onboard successful Aboriginal candidates
who can demonstrate an aptitude for the work. These
should then be trained in-house, in a fashion similar
to that undertaken here in Canada during the early 1970’s,
when the effort was first made to establish the cadre
of a home-grown conservation profession in this country.
In Canada this means that our conservation professional
organizations and advocacy groups, our training institutions,
and our public sector employers, should be working in
concert to craft innovative ways in which existing Employment
Equity Act legislation can be applied to accomplish
this.
Simply put, the minimum standard
set in the legislation is that the number of Aboriginal
persons gainfully employed in the combined professional/technical
job classifications should reflect the availability
of Aboriginal persons in the national workforce at large.
Where the provision of a public service is aimed primarily
at an Aboriginal audience or constituency, or where
the subject matter dealt with reflects Aboriginal experience
(as with museum collections of Aboriginal material culture),
then the further argument is made that those providing
the service be Aboriginal persons themselves.
Thus, the principle of equity
in employment is simply that the diversity of any given
workforce should reflect the diversity of the nation’s
population at large. The practices of achieving equity
include these key steps:
1. a Communications
strategy to sensitize our members and our employers
to the requirement to attract more indigenous conservators
to the workforce;
2. a Workforce
survey so that current practitioners can self-identify
as to their indigenous heritage;
3. a Workforce
analysis of the findings of this survey so that
we can determine the percentage of current practitioners
who do indeed self-identify as indigenous;
4. and finally an Employment
systems review so that any systemic barriers
that would account for the under-representation of practicing
conservators of indigenous heritage may be identified,
and special measures to remove these systemic barriers
can be described and implemented, and their progress
monitored.
In closing, while we need to see
the emergence of a unique conservation approach that
fuses both technical and traditional methods, we equally
need to see the emergence of a conservation workforce
which itself is representative of the cultures whose
patrimony it presumes to safeguard.
John Moses
Conservator & Researcher
Canadian Museum of Civilization
Gatineau, QC
1 United Nations Human Rights Council
Resolution 2006/2, United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples, proclaimed 29 June 2006.
2 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1996), Appendix
E, Final Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal
Peoples: Ethical Guidelines for Research, available
in downloadable format at <www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ch/rcap/sg/ska5e_e.html>
3 Canadian Museums Association and the Assembly of First
Nations (1991), Task Force Report on Museums and First
Peoples ~ Turning the Page: Forging New Partnerships
Between Museums and First Peoples, Ottawa: Canadian
Museums Association.
4 Canada (1995), Employment Equity Act, Revised Statutes
of Canada, Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.
|